WHAT IS A PERSONAL GUARANTEE (PG)?
A Personal Guarantee is a secondary obligation where an individual (director/shareholder) promises to pay the company’s debt if the company fails.
Key principle
A PG does not automatically make you liable — the creditor must prove:
-
A valid primary debt
-
A valid, properly executed guarantee
-
A triggered liability event
-
Proper creditor behaviour (no unfairness / misrepresentation)
If the lender fails on any of these points, the PG collapses.
WHY CREDITORS LOVE PERSONAL GUARANTEES
Lenders use PGs because:
They bypass limited liability
A company can fold — a PG keeps the director on the hook.
They reduce the lender’s risk to near zero
Creditors threaten:
-
Charging Orders
-
Attachment of Earnings
-
Bankruptcy
-
Enforcement agents
This pushes many directors into settlement, even when the PG is defective.
They create leverage
Most PG disputes settle because directors panic.
But a PG is only enforceable if it is valid. Most are NOT.
WHAT MAKES A PERSONAL GUARANTEE VALID?
For a PG to be enforceable, the creditor must prove:
A. The guarantee document exists and is signed
Courts require:
-
Clear, legible signed document
-
Correct parties
-
Terms explained
-
No ambiguity
If the lender relies on a digital tickbox, a reconstructed document, or unsigned terms → challenge.
B. The terms were clear and brought to the guarantor’s attention
If the PG was hidden within:
-
a long loan document
-
an online platform
-
a sequence of tickboxes
…this is ambiguous and potentially voidable.
C. No misrepresentation
If the lender or broker said anything like:
-
“This is a standard document”
-
“It’s just a formality”
-
“The business is liable, not you personally”
-
“You won’t personally be chased”
The PG can be voided for misrepresentation.
D. No undue pressure or imbalance
If the lender created urgency:
-
“Sign today or funding collapses”
-
“No signature = business failure”
This affects enforceability.
E. Compliance with the primary agreement
A PG is only enforceable if the underlying agreement is enforceable.
If the lender cannot prove the company debt, they cannot enforce the PG.
TO BE VERY WARY OF (RED FLAGS)
These are the triggers that normally destroy PG enforcement:
1. Digital or click-wrap guarantees
Many lenders (Iwoca, Funding Circle, OnStride, etc.) use:
-
clickboxes
-
online journey screens
-
reconstructed PDFs
Courts treat these sceptically unless properly evidenced.
2. No independent legal advice
Not a requirement —
BUT if the guarantee is onerous or unclear, lack of advice weakens enforceability.
3. Hidden guarantees within general terms
If the PG was not explicitly highlighted → voidable.
4. Misleading threats
If the lender created the impression that:
-
a non-judicial document was a court order
-
immediate enforcement would happen
-
no dispute existed
-
the PG had already crystallised
This becomes a defence asset.
5. Incorrect entity names
If the PG names a trading style (not a legal entity), e.g.:
-
“Iwoca” instead of Iwoca Ltd
→ The PG can be challenged under contract certainty and identification of parties.
6. Assignment/title defects
If the loan was reassigned without correct notice under LPA 1925 s.136, you attack title — the PG falls with it.
7. Defective Tomlin Orders or Consent Orders
If the creditor uses a fake or defective Tomlin Order to push the PG into payment:
-
not sealed
-
not judicially approved
-
not properly filed
→ Any PG admission inside it collapses.
This is the exact flaw in the Iwoca case.
HOW TO ATTACK A PERSONAL GUARANTEE
STEP 1 — Attack the Primary Agreement
If the company debt is flawed, the PG automatically fails.
Check for:
-
Errors in the loan contract
-
Incorrect entity
-
Missing assignment
-
Interest miscalculations
-
Unfair relationship (s.140A CCA if consumer/sole trader)
-
Defective demands
No valid primary debt = no PG liability.
STEP 2 — Demand Strict Proof of the Guarantee
Ask for:
-
Original signed PG
-
Complete audit log (if digital)
-
IP addresses / timestamps
-
Clear version of terms
-
Evidence the PG was explained
Most lenders cannot produce these.
STEP 3 — Attack clarity and prominence
Was the PG hidden in small print?
Was it on page 8 of a long document?
Was it part of a rushed online flow?
If not “plainly and fairly brought to your attention” → voidable.
STEP 4 — Attack misrepresentation or pressure
If the lender or solicitor:
-
portrayed a document as a court order
-
claimed there were no defences
-
pressured you into signing
→ The guarantee can be rescinded for misrepresentation.
STEP 5 — Attack jurisdictional / procedural defects
If the PG was enforced via:
-
CNBC “orders”
-
Unsealed Tomlin Orders
-
Orders not reviewed by a judge
→ Procedural invalidity collapses enforcement.
STEP 6 — Challenge assignment and title
If the debt was securitised, sold, or transferred without proper legal notice, the PG cannot be enforced.
STEP 7 — Apply equitable and contractual defences
Examples:
-
Lack of consideration
-
Unfair terms
-
Contra proferentem (ambiguity interpreted against drafter)
-
Fiduciary / trust breaches in securitised loans
-
Failure to mitigate
STEP 8 — Use lender conduct as a sword
Unfair, misleading, or aggressive behaviour can shift power to the guarantor.
A PG is a contract — misconduct weakens its enforceability.
6. SUMMARY — THE REALITY LENDERS DON’T WANT DIRECTORS TO KNOW
Most Personal Guarantees fail because:
✔ The underlying debt is flawed
✔ The guarantee was digitally created without proper audit
✔ The lender misrepresented its effect
✔ The creditor cannot prove who owns the debt
✔ The guarantee terms were hidden
✔ The PG never reached the threshold of clarity required by law
✔ Enforcement relied on defective “orders”